I just read a book and saw a movie, and each had “corny” elements. But I highly recommend the book, and disagree with the critics who said the movie is terrible. Corny, by the way, can be defined as “overly or simplistically sentimental” or as “trite and melodramatic.”
The book, The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society, does have a sentimental and predictable main plot triangle, but is very readable and takes you to a world you may not have known about. It could be minimized as “chick lit,” but this male liked it a lot.
The movie, Sex and the City 2, could also be dismissed as predictable and overly dramatic fluff (as most critics have said), and it is mostly meant for SATC addicts. However, it deals with several important issues (marriage, parenthood, menopause, women’s rights, sexuality, friendship) and some of the scenes illustrate these issues in memorable ways. Many will hate it (especially since it is 2 1/2 hours long), but I didn’t. I found the Abu Dhabi segment interesting; I suspect they accurately portrayed some of the cultural contradictions. I won’t rate it highly for acting, and the conspicuous consumption (and product placement) can get sickening, so if you go, go with low expectations.
The main reason I decided to write a post about this is I want to defend “simplistic, trite, sentimental and melodramatic” a bit. Life experiences and lessons learned can be corny, yet also profoundly meaningful. Melodrama and sentimentality permeate our lives, and seeing them in the mirror of art (or entertainment) can make us uncomfortable. “Trite” means over-used, and “banal” means commonplace, but the other sides of those coins (to use a trite phrase) are “familiar” and “universal.” Do we only value that which is original and unique?